nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:25:19 -0800
On Dec 25, 2020, at 09:45 , Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> wrote: On 12/25/20 4:52 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:For the home, if you're looking at shipping 10Gbps-based CPE's for under US$200, I can't think of anything other than the Tik: https://mikrotik.com/product/rb4011igs_rmThat has 1 10g port. How can that be a 10g CPE?They claim: - 2.6Gbps forwarding for 64-byte packets. - 7.8Gbps forwarding for 512-byte packets. - 9.7Gbps forwarding for 1,518-byte packets.so, not 10g :) Add in some services and I bet it goes down from there. The bigger question in all this if you're doing 10g to the residential user, what are they going to use for their home router/NAT device? Even 60 ghz wifi routers top out at like 5 gbit/s, and NAT at this speed means a powerful CPU.
Sounds like a great reason not to do NAT… If you run IPv6, who needs NAT? For the rest, there are relatively cheap 2x10G+rest 1G switches coming available and there’s this weirdness with 2G/5G RJ ports now appearing to try and eke out additional wifi performance over cat5e I guess. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- RE: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Tony Wicks (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Jared Mauch (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 25)