nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:11:01 +0200
On 12/26/20 17:55, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
Since a lot of ISP equipment only has tiny buffers you will generally be unable to get great downloads from sources far away.
This is true for any application, in general.500ms vs. 1ms for download efficiency will always show you what they are made of, regardless of how ridiculous the buffers are.
The solution has always been to get content as close to the eyeballs as possible. The positive side-effect with this, also, is that downloads complete sooner, freeing up the line quicker.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Filip Hruska (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Jared Mauch (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Cory Sell via NANOG (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE Chris Adams (Dec 25)