nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:05:14 +0200
On 3/Aug/20 14:36, Alex Band wrote:
According to the information I received from the community[1], you should read PR1461602 and PR1309944 before deploying.
The good news is the code that fixes both of those issues is shipping. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990, (continued)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Hank Nussbacher (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Darrell Budic (Aug 02)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- RE: BGP route hijack by AS10990 adamv0025 (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Alex Band (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Job Snijders (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Baldur Norddahl (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Rich Kulawiec (Aug 27)
- Re: BGP route hijack by AS10990 Mark Tinka (Aug 03)