nanog mailing list archives

Re: CGNAT Solutions

From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:53:25 -0700

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:12 PM John Alcock <john () alcock org> wrote:

I run a small ISP in Tennessee.  I am starting to run low on IP's and need to consider CGNAT.


Hi John,

How small is small? Up to a certain size regular NAT with enough
logging to trace back abusers will tend to work fine. if we're talking
single-digit gbps, it may not be worth the effort to consider the
wonderful world of CGNAT.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
https://bill.herrin.us/

Current thread:

CGNAT Solutions John Alcock (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Baldur Norddahl (Apr 28)
- RE: CGNAT Solutions Aaron Gould (Apr 28)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 28)
  - Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 28)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 28)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 29)
    - Message not available
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
    - Re: CGNAT Solutions JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 29)

(Thread continues...)