nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:03:26 -0400
Hello Lars, As a comment there is a draft that proposes to deprecate AS_SET https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set/?include_text=1 Alejandro, On 4/11/20 7:09 AM, Lars Prehn wrote:
Hi everyone, how exactly do you aggregate routes? When do you add the AS_SET attribute, when do you omit it? How does the latter interplay with RPKI? Best regards, Lars
Attachment:
pEpkey.asc
Description:
Current thread:
- Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 14)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Deepak Jain (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Alejandro Acosta (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Warren Kumari (Apr 14)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)