nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment

From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:43:28 +0200

It appears in your thought experiment, a stick is dressed up like a carrot.

I’m not a fan of deploying purely punitive strategies to promote adoption;
technologies should stand on their own and be able to convince the
potential users based on their merit, not based on penalties.

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Warren Kumari (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment tim () pelican org (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Steve Pointer (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Job Snijders (Oct 02)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Antonios Chariton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment John Levine (Oct 02)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Antonios Chariton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Stephen Satchell (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Nick Hilliard (Oct 02)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Daniel Seagraves (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Justin Streiner (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Martin Hannigan (Oct 02)

(Thread continues...)