nanog mailing list archives

Re: This DNS over HTTP thing


From: Jan Philippi <jan () philippi pw>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:01:14 +0200

The thing is: People were conditioned for years to look for the padlock,
because padlock means secure.

How will we ever get this out of their minds..

Jan

SMTP: jan () philippi pw
XMPP: jan () himbeere pw
GPG: 45F3 2DF0 4D55 C4B4 2083  14C5 5727 D54F *E4E2 2A3C*

Am 02.10.19 um 11:45 schrieb Valdis Klētnieks:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 01:55:13 -0600, "Keith Medcalf" said:

It is a common fallacy that TLS connections are authenticated.  The vast
majority of them are not authenticated in any meaningful fashion and all that
can be said about TLS is that it provides an encrypted connection between the
two communicating applications.  This is perhaps why it is call *transport*
layer security ...

Another major disconnect is that TLS validates the hostname that the browser
decided to connect to, not the host you thought you were connecting to..

The end result is that if a phish directs you to nan0g.org, it can still show a
padlock and the user is none the wiser....


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: