Re: fuzzy subnet aggregation

[Antonio Querubin <tony () lavanauts org>]

Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of addresses but also minimize covered 
addresses that are not part of the mandatory set?

Tony

> On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com> wrote:
>
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com> wrote:
>
> > >
> >
> > your aim is to get to maximum aggregation .. with some overage, like
> > 90% of a /24  ?
> > so missing like 25 addresses in a whole /24.. (for instance)
>
> I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc...
>
> This is not punitive, its about scale.
>
> Joe