Re: asymmetric routing issue on microsoft torix ix

[Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>]

So, I'm gonna go out on a bit of a limb here, though I don't think by much. I wasn't aware, but CANARIE is an NREN, so 
probably you get cheap/free transit through that, versus some greater transit rate via Shaw. 

You can decide your own outbound policy, but you can't really wield that influence over inbound. In some cases maybe 
the far end network may have incentive to play along and tweak their routing policy, but I somewhat doubt Microsoft 
would maintain special routing policy just for you. 

So you are left with your regular inbound influence bag of tricks, e.g. prepending towards Shaw. If your upstream is a 
bit more feature-rich they may have some control communities you can use to influence how they advertise your prefixes, 
but I don't recall Shaw having anything as fine grained as "don't announce to this peer" like you might find on a route 
server. Prepending is a bit of a bigger hammer, though, as it affects the advertisements to any Shaw peers/customers

Others may chime in with others possible inbound TE tricks, but nothing would beat e.g. getting a port at torix or SIX 
(you mentioned both) yourself and just peering with Microsoft directly. 

On October 17, 2019 2:06:53 p.m. PDT, Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com> wrote:
> On Thu 2019-Oct-17 14:19:54 -0600, Samir Rana <samir.rana () cybera ca>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > We have asymmetric routing issues from Microsoft TORIX connection
> between
> > Microsoft and CANARIE and Microsoft and SHAW.
> >
> > We are sending traffic via Cybera-CANARIE-Microsoft ( SIX ) and
> > receiving via Microsoft-Shaw-Cybera ( SIX ).
>
> And?  Like, why is this a problem?  Internet routing is highly 
> asymmetrical.
>
> > if anyone from Microsoft is available please contact me offline.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Samir
> > 403.210.5382

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal