nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 on mobile networks, was Update to BCP-38?


From: Brandon Jackson via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 19:38:39 -0400

Yep I see this on AT&t's post paid network with my Pixel 3A XL as well, one
place I really noticed it causing issues is with Facebook and Instagram
where Facebook requires constant captions to view any Facebook links I
receive and embedded Instagram content in news articles and things of that
nature often failed load. It is very annoying.



Brandon Jackson


On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 16:19 Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:



On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:40 PM John R. Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

In article <d3f78384-9b25-c4c4-495f-5dcc0e0c1925 () satchell net>,
Stephen Satchell <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
My AT&T cell phone has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.  The IPv4 address
is from my access point; the IPv6 address appears to be a public
address.

My AT&T cellphone (via MVNO Tracfone) has a 10/8 IPv4 address and IPv6
address 2600:380:28be:8b34:2504:2096:6ac7:6262.  But when I connect to a
web site that reports the connecting address, it says I'm
2600:387:a:9a2::8.

What's going on there?  Those are both within at&t's 2600:300::/24', but
am I behind a NAT66?  An aggressive web cache?


This is a unique proxying feature of AT&T

Tmobile US, VZ, and Sprint all have IPv6, but only AT&T has this behavior
afaik.



--
Regards,
John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly



Current thread: