nanog mailing list archives
Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:04:37 +0200
On 15/Nov/19 11:33, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Correct. The optimum location for peering is at the center of population density and the center of economic transaction density, since that minimizes average cable lengths to users. I’ve never observed a cable landing site in the downtown core of a metro area.
The closest you would get is coastal cities, but even then, a CLS just doesn't operate the same way as a data centre. Mark.
Current thread:
- Landing Stations used as datacenter Mehmet Akcin (Nov 14)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Mehmet Akcin (Nov 14)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Bill Woodcock (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Nikolas Geyer (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Mehmet Akcin (Nov 14)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Owen DeLong (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Javier J (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Andrew Paolucci via NANOG (Nov 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Clayton Zekelman (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Andrew Paolucci via NANOG (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Owen DeLong (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Owen DeLong (Nov 15)
- Re: Landing Stations used as datacenter Javier J (Nov 16)