nanog mailing list archives

RE: FRR as Route-Reflector & Scaling stats


From: <adamv0025 () netconsultings com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:04:12 -0000

ERCIN TORUN
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 9:34 AM

Hello Rakesh,

As James said, better to ask it at FRR mailing list.

Generally chipset is what limits the scale (e.g. trident2 is 128k ipv4 lpm
https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/cumulus-linux/Layer-3/Routing/ ).  If
you disable "zebra" daemon, FRR works only in control-plane then you would
most likely have a limitation with memory/RAM only. (speed is another
issue).

Data-plane lookup memory limitations have nothing to do with the scale of a RR function, as you eluded to (if the RR is 
in path then it has to act as any other routing node so FIB scaling limitations apply -but that is completely 
orthogonal to the RR function). 
One would assume that NOS to be used for a crucial role in the overall BGP infrastructure would feature the essential 
ability to limit the installation (complete/selective) of routes to FIB/data-plane. (or in the modern virtual 
deployments lack the data-plane altogether). 

adam   


Current thread: