nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamming of NANOG list members
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 16:38:09 -0600
On 5/24/19 4:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
I guess you don’t get Comcast abuse reports, below is an example: "e7f05f85ba44ad3393e7b086eed202ee b2cca3a3ae3825c36999e12722e83830" <eed6df6cd94ee61a5091e4d46af49993 () gmail com>, "Ed d95a762f93c99703afe76d25f1679ea4" <d9bf58b67f09a3bec99fff00b2f12160 () comcast net>
Those look like they are probably MD5 hashes (I'm guessing) of names.So your proposed algorithm would be trivial to extend to add MD5 hashes of permutations.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members, (continued)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members John Peach (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Bryan Holloway (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Niels Bakker (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Richard (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Paul Ferguson (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Grant Taylor via NANOG (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Scott Christopher (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Scott Christopher (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Rich Kulawiec (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Eric Tykwinski (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Grant Taylor via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Daniel Seagraves (May 24)