nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP prefix filter list
From: Dan White <dwhite () olp net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:52:47 -0500
On 05/15/19 13:44 +0000, Phil Lavin wrote:
We recently filtered out >=/24 prefixes since we're impacted by 768k day.What kind of network are you running? Doing such prefix filtering on an eyeball network strikes me as insane - you'd be cutting off customers from huge swathes of the Internet (including small companies like us) that don't have large IPv4 sequential allocations.
We're an eyeball network. We accept default routes from our transit providers so in theory there should be no impact on reachability. I'm pretty concerned about things that I don't know due to inefficient routing, e.g. customers hitting a public anycast DNS server in the wrong location resulting in Geolocation issues. -- Dan White BTC Broadband Network Admin Lead Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000 Fax 918.366.6610 email: dwhite () mybtc com http://www.btcbroadband.com
Current thread:
- BGP prefix filter list Baldur Norddahl (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Anderson, Charles R (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Martin Hannigan (May 20)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Dan White (May 15)
- RE: BGP prefix filter list Phil Lavin (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Dan White (May 15)
- RE: BGP prefix filter list Phil Lavin (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Dan White (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Ca By (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Mike Hammett (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Ca By (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Mike Hammett (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Blake Hudson (May 16)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 17)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Blake Hudson (May 17)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list / BGP hijacks, different type Denys Fedoryshchenko (May 17)
- RE: BGP prefix filter list Phil Lavin (May 15)
- Re: BGP prefix filter list Anderson, Charles R (May 15)