nanog mailing list archives

Re: Issues with SIP packets between VZ Fios and NTT


From: Dovid Bender <dovid () telecurve com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:32:37 -0400

FYI: More than one person reached out to me off list. The issue is clearly
with VZ. Traces by the others were done and NTT was not in the mix. The
only common denominator was 401 SIP packets hitting VZ Fios IP's in the NY
area.



On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 1:04 PM Dovid Bender <dovid () telecurve com> wrote:

Good ol UDP encrypted.



On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:


On 5/13/2019 10:20 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:
Thought of that. Customers have their own CPE's. So far the only thing
mutual here is that it's NTT -> VZ. Here is what I found so far looking
at two Polycom phones using non standard ports (e.g. not 5060)
1) PhoneA tries to register multiple extensions and for each request we
send a 401. We expect to get back a REGISTER request with a no-once but
we don't. This happens for a while and then magically it starts working.
2) PhoneB tries to register the time time as PhoneA and has no issues.

At first I thought it was something possibly with the SIP call-ID but I
ruled that out since in the same SIP DIALOG it was not working then it
started. Also the seems to be per phone each phone is behind NAT and
the
traffic is coming from a different NAT'd port. Seems like there is some
device in the middle that is randomly dropping traffic on specific
sessions.


Are you using TLS encrypted SIP or just plain ol' cleartext?

If its encrypted, I'd look at possibly there being a MTU/MSS issue
somewhere along the path possibly?


--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org



Current thread: