Re: Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?

[Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>]

I think what you were remembering is Cogent/Google and Cogent/HE are both 
IPv6 issues where the parties can't agree on peering vs transit for the v6 
relationship.

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, David Hubbard wrote:

> Oops, I was corrected that HE doesn’t have IPv6 issues with Google, not sure why I had that in my head.  Cogent 
> certainly does but something had me thinking there’s another big name
> that has the same problem.
>
>  
>
> David
>
>  
>
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 12:40 PM
> To: NANOG List <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
>
>  
>
> Hey all, I’ve been having bad luck searching around, but did IPv6 transit between HE and google ever get resolved?  
> Ironically, I can now get to them cheaply from a location we
> currently have equipment that has been Cogent-only, so if it fixes the IPv6 issue I’d like to make the move.  Anyone 
> peer with HE in general and want to share their experience
> offlist?  With the price, if they’re a good option, I’d consider rolling them in to other locations where we have 
> redundancy already, so the v6 isn’t as big a deal there.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
>  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
                             |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________