nanog mailing list archives
Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:31:57 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Tom Hill wrote:
On 25/03/2019 09:17, Sean Donelan wrote:Its always a bad idea to do packet filtering at your bgp border.Wild assertion. Why?
My mistake trying to keep it simple. I should have just posted Barry Greene's link.
http://www.senki.org/exploitable-port-filtering/
Current thread:
- Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering marcel.duregards--- via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Hill (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Beecher (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Bryan Holloway (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Tom Beecher (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Jason Hellenthal via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Ca By (Mar 25)
- Re: Incoming SSDP UDP 1900 filtering Hansen, Christoffer (Mar 25)