nanog mailing list archives
Re: QFX5k question
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 15:09:21 -0600
On 3/23/19 1:41 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there,
Hi,
in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more importantly (besides from what juniper papers say) are there any known issues people run into for a small scale deployment. (100mbps-1gbps range 1 rack, 20 servers)my plan is to have QFX to it all, but i am worried, if this is too much for QFX, if you have relative experience on this , feel free to let me know
We have a large number of QFX5100s deployed as L3 ToRs. They are running anywhere between 50 G and 150 G through them, depending on the deployment. They work fairly well for us.
I don't know if they can hold a full internet DFZ BGP feed or not. I don't know if that's an issue for you or not.
thanks in advance
You're welcome, and good luck. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Paul S. (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Niels Bakker (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Sander Steffann (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Mehmet Akcin (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Joseph Jenkins (Mar 23)
- RE: QFX5k question Tony Wicks (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Thomas Bellman (Mar 23)
- Re: QFX5k question Denys Fedoryshchenko (Mar 24)
- Re: QFX5k question Paul S. (Mar 23)