nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:24:44 -0700
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry () jtcloe net> wrote:There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it.--- cb.list6 () gmail com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> My understanding is that is not currently commonly the case https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png --------------------------------------------------- Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space? Or are they just not continuing to expand into it? scott
They stopped using ipv4 assigned for handsets for most cases with 464xlat https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/case-study-t-mobile-us-goes-ipv6-only-using-464xlat/ BT did similar https://www.ipv6.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Nick-Heatley_BT_EE_Update_UKv6Council_201801207.pdf And Telstra https://blog.apnic.net/2017/01/13/telstras-five-year-mobile-ipv6-plan-becomes-reality/ And SK https://blog.apnic.net/2019/06/03/ipv6-deployment-and-challenges-at-sk-telecom/ And Rogers, Telus, and others