nanog mailing list archives

Re: Performance metrics used in commercial BGP route optimizers


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:37:35 +0300

On 16/07/2019 20:41, Job Snijders wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:33 PM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net <mailto:nanog () ics-il net>> wrote:

    More like do whatever you want in your own house as long as you
    don't infringe upon others.


That's where the rub is; when using "BGP optimisers" to influence public Internet routing, you cannot guarantee you won't infringe upon others.

    The argument against route optimizers (assuming appropriate
    ingress\egress filters) is a religious one and should be treated
    as such.

There is a difference between BGP optimizers and route optimizers.  When was the last time you heard a complain about Akamai screwing up the global routing table over the past 12 years:

https://www.akamai.com/us/en/about/news/press/2007-press/akamai-introduces-advanced-communications-protocol-for-accelerating-dynamic-applications.jsp

https://developer.akamai.com/legacy/learn/Optimization/SureRoute.html

-Hank



Current thread: