nanog mailing list archives
Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:57:23 +0000
Why would you want to settle a pointless debate? :) -mel beckman
On Jan 25, 2019, at 6:45 AM, Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net> wrote:On 25/01/2019 04:47, Steven Bahnsen wrote: First time poster looking for some input on a debateThis won't settle anything. You've just started the same old debate again, from the beginning. Again. :) There are almost certainly indexed threads of this mailing list with enough answers to this question to last a life time of arguments. (See also, c-nsp, probably j-nsp, UKNOF, etc.) -- Tom
Current thread:
- [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Steven Bahnsen (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Mel Beckman (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Jan 25)
- RE: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Aaron Gould (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Jan 25)