nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP Experiment
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:27:40 +0000
Contact your hardware vendor. That is not acceptable behavior. If it is not RFC compliant they need to accept the attribute, if it's not RFC compliant they should gracefully ignore it. Now we all know that anyone using that gear is vulnerable to a DoS attack. Won't be long until anyone else sends that to you. Steven Naslund Chicago IL
Well, here, when you receive this particular attribute and if you're vulnerable, your equipment automatically gets disconnected from the Internet, so the issue kinda solves >itself. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 10)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)