nanog mailing list archives
Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability...
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 17 Jan 2019 15:40:30 -0500
In article <39BFCD05-62CB-46C7-83E6-0CC25D393137 () delong com> you write:
If v6 were such a problem as described, I think it wouldn’t be so readily embraced by facebook, google, Comcast, Netflix, etc.
Their priorities are probably not your priorities. For example, I expect they want to be able to distinguish among the devices behind a v4 NAT so they can segment and market more precisely. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Current thread:
- No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... John Von Essen (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... Blake Hudson (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... Owen DeLong (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... John Levine (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... Owen DeLong (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... John Levine (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... Ca By (Jan 17)
- Re: No IPv6 by design to increase reliability... Carlos M. Martinez (Jan 17)