nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networks
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:06:22 -0500
SDN originally meant 'separate the forwarding plane from the control plane, and do wacky stuff with the CP'. It's been applied over the years as a nice buzzwordy marketing term for just about anything that involves software interacting with network hardware in any way. Not correct of course, but that's never stopped anyone from try to sell before. :) On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:58 PM Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com> wrote:
Can someone explain what is all the fuss? SDN is like the latest telecom craze but the articles do a poor job of explaining the advantages. I seek concrete examples. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com New York City & Budapest rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com 36-70-605-5144 [image: 1467221477350_image005.png]
Current thread:
- Software Defined Networks Rod Beck (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Nick Morrison via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks lobna gouda (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Bryan Holloway (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Jörg Kost (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Bruce H McIntosh (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Miles Fidelman (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Large Hadron Collider (Dec 12)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Quan Zhou (Dec 12)
- Expect (was: Software Defined Networks) Stephen Satchell (Dec 12)