nanog mailing list archives
Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:45:13 +0200
On 18/Dec/19 00:35, Randy Bush wrote:
and how does that work out at scale when roa changes need previous bgp to be run against them?
If I'm honest, not something I've studied in great detail. For the moment, we are running RPKI on IOS XE boxes that are doing just peering. We have not had any routing issues on those, and I do know of a few networks that had fat-fingered their ROA's that led them to get dropped on our end due to being Invalid. The issue cleared up after they fixed their error, and there was no manual intervention needed on these routers. The customer edge is where we shall be dropping Invalids on this code base on a much larger scale. Notes to take; plenty... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers, (continued)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Matt Corallo (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Rubens Kuhl (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Nick Hilliard (Dec 11)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Mark Tinka (Dec 16)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 17)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Mark Tinka (Dec 17)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Randy Bush (Dec 17)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Mark Tinka (Dec 17)
- Re: Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers Mark Tinka (Dec 11)