Re: [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been dis

[Chriztoffer Hansen <chriztoffer () netravnen de>]

cyrus,

cyrus ramirez wrote on 04/08/2019 21:40:
> If you're looking for vendor neutral FHRP, VRRP has RFC
> documentation. GLBP and HSRP are Cisco proprietary protocols
> and are protected information other than the study material
> and how too out there.

The thing about the study material I know already. (have been
through both ccna- and ccnp-level route/switch/design training material
in recent 1-4 years)

The question was simply about if GLBP/HSRP had ever been up in 
discussions in the IETF concerning publishing the protocol 
specifications as a standard. (As pointed out. I totally forgot about 
the RFC concerning HSRP.) Haven't gotten a response on the GLBP part. 
Which I am more than doubtful, myself, will ever come to fruition as a 
standard in an IETF WG.

--

[ have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? ]
[ Chriztoffer Hansen            +1 914 3133553 ]
[   0x18dd23c550293098de07052a9dcf2ca008ebd2e8 ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature