nanog mailing list archives

Re: Console Servers


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:21:21 -0500 (CDT)

Except for AT&T, most incumbents here aren't also mobile wireless providers, so that is an option in most cases for 
truly OOB. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Saku Ytti" <saku () ytti fi> 
To: "James Bensley" <jwbensley () gmail com> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 4:04:58 AM 
Subject: Re: Console Servers 

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 11:54, James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com> wrote: 

I forgot to mention, it also depends how "out" of band your OOB needs 
to be. We use Ciena 6500s for our DWDM infrastructure and they have a 
wayside channel (like various DWDM vendors), so it's a separate 
channel over the same physical fibre. For anything except a fibre cut 
it seems to work. 

This is gold standard for incumbents, as they don't have anything true 
out-of-band they can consistently buy, everything travels in their 
network at some point anyhow. 

-- 
++ytti 


Current thread: