nanog mailing list archives
Re: Console Servers
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:21:21 -0500 (CDT)
Except for AT&T, most incumbents here aren't also mobile wireless providers, so that is an option in most cases for truly OOB. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Saku Ytti" <saku () ytti fi> To: "James Bensley" <jwbensley () gmail com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 4:04:58 AM Subject: Re: Console Servers On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 11:54, James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com> wrote:
I forgot to mention, it also depends how "out" of band your OOB needs to be. We use Ciena 6500s for our DWDM infrastructure and they have a wayside channel (like various DWDM vendors), so it's a separate channel over the same physical fibre. For anything except a fibre cut it seems to work.
This is gold standard for incumbents, as they don't have anything true out-of-band they can consistently buy, everything travels in their network at some point anyhow. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Console Servers, (continued)
- Re: Console Servers Louis Kowolowski (Sep 18)
- Re: Console Servers William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Console Servers Alain Hebert (Sep 18)
- Re: Console Servers Saku Ytti (Sep 18)
- Re: Console Servers James Bensley (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Saku Ytti (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers James Bensley (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Owen DeLong (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers James Bensley (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers James Bensley (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Saku Ytti (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Mike Hammett (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Owen DeLong (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Mike Hammett (Sep 19)
- Re: Console Servers Tim Pozar (Sep 18)
- Re: Console Servers Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- RE: Console Servers Matthew Huff (Sep 18)
- RE: Console Servers Ryan Hamel (Sep 18)
- RE: Console Servers Erik Sundberg (Sep 18)