nanog mailing list archives

Re: Service provider story about tracking down TCP RSTs


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 16:00:36 -0400

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 2:51 PM,  <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:
pointing out that a
single traceroute to a Fastly site was hitting two of their POPs (they use
anycast) and because they don’t sync state between POPs the second POP would
naturally issue a TCP RST (sidebar: fascinating blog article on Fastly’s
infrastructure here:
https://www.fastly.com/blog/building-and-scaling-fastly-network-part-2-balancing-requests).

Oh for Pete's sake. If they're going to attempt Anycast TCP with a
unicast protocol stack they should at least have the sense to suppress
the RSTs.

Better yet, do the job right and build an anycast TCP stack as
described here: https://bill.herrin.us/network/anycasttcp.html

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>


Current thread: