nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN TAL copyright
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 03:40:11 +0200
On 15 Oct 2018, at 6:13 PM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:
I understand the issue is that ARIN wants protection from being sued, should I somehow harm myself with this service.
To be clear, ARIN would like to make sure that should any network operators impact their services through use of the ARIN RPKI repository [something that really shouldn’t really be possible given network operators following best practices e.g. RFC 7115] that when such operators are litigated by their customers (or those trying to reach their customers), the liability remains with the network operator. Obviously if ARIN is acting with malfeasance or is grossly negligent, then the liability should be with ARIN, but indemnification clauses are generally inapplicable in such circumstances. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
Current thread:
- ARIN TAL copyright Baldur Norddahl (Oct 15)
- Re: ARIN TAL copyright John Curran (Oct 15)