nanog mailing list archives
Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage)
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:20:26 +0200
On 1/Oct/18 01:21, John Curran wrote:
It is possible to architect the various legalities surrounding RPKI to support any of the above outcomes, but it first requires a shared understanding of what the network community believes is the correct outcome. There is likely some on the nanog mailing list who have a view on this matter, so I pose the question of "who should be responsible" for consequences of RPKI RIR CA failure to this list for further discussion.
John, in the instance where all RIR's transition to a single "All Resource" TA, what would, in your mind, be the (potential) liability considerations? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) Alex Band (Oct 01)
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) John Curran (Oct 01)
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) Claudio Jeker (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage) Nick Hilliard (Oct 01)