nanog mailing list archives
Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:50:04 +0200
You may use this document, which passed already the last-call and is in the AD/IESG review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/ My co-authors may help you to get those products … I’ve been using myself OpenWRT for such deployments. Regards, Jordi De: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> en nombre de Tom Ammon <thomasammon () gmail com> Fecha: miércoles, 10 de octubre de 2018, 0:14 Para: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Are there any CPE vendors providing MAP-T features yet? I'm working on rolling v6 to residential subscribers and am trying to understand what the landscape looks like on the CPE side, for MAP-T specifically. What about 464XLAT on a CPE - is that a thing? I know that 464XLAT has been running for a while on some mobile provider networks, but are there any vendors out there with a decent/mature CLAT implementation in a CPE product that is ready to buy right now? Thanks, Tom -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Ammon M: (801) 784-2628 thomasammon () gmail com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Tom Ammon (Oct 09)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Daniel Corbe (Oct 09)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Oct 09)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Philip Loenneker (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Ca By (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Brock Tice (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Tom Ammon (Oct 11)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Philip Loenneker (Oct 11)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Aaron Gould (Oct 12)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Brock Tice (Oct 12)