RE: NANOG Security Track: Route Security

[Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel () quadranet com>]

Ryan, what does the track moderator have to do with the presenter? All I here is an excuse to do a disservice to fellow 
members of this community.

Do you really want to have future meetings with everyone holding out their phones, cameras, or other recording devices, 
to spread the wealth of knowledge? That's crazy.

Ryan Hamel

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Ryan Woolley
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 11:48 AM
To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:16 AM Netravnen <netravnen () gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:01, John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu> wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 03:27:49 +0000
> > Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel () quadranet com> wrote:
> >
> > > Just like how all the email threads on NANOG are archived, all 
> > > talks should be archived as well.
> >
> > Whether to record a session or not is up to the presenter and track 
> > coordinator.
>
> I would prefer if NANOG would record sessions by default! (And allow 
> presenters to opt-out if they really feel like it.)
>
> Other conferences I have had participated to in the past. Had the 
> option of allowing opt-out of being recorded on stage.

This is in fact how it works now at NANOG.  As John points out, the decision is left up to the submitter, but almost 
all talks are webcast and recorded.  (Historically, the security track has not been
recorded.)

Anyone is welcome to submit talks, including tracks, for consideration, and to make this choice as submitter.  In this 
case, the track moderator believes that it's better that the the talk to not be recorded and so we are honoring that 
request.

Aside from the security track and one other submission, the remainder of the 3-day program will be available for 
viewing and recorded.

Regards,

Ryan Woolley
NANOG PC Chair