nanog mailing list archives
Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic
From: Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:11:22 -0500
at 8:40 PM, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:
Nobody should ever be forced to peer to get someone to address abusive traffic originating from networks under their control.
Especially considering the fact that Amazon is just a bit selective about their peers. Though, the size of our border probably had a lot to do with the fact that we didn’t get a response the first time when we requested peering for our 10s of megabits of traffic, we none the less didn’t get a response the first time we tried. Not even a “go away until you have some traffic of significance.”
In the end, we had to implore a back channel to get a peering session set up.
Current thread:
- Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic John Weekes (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic John Weekes (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic John (Nov 08)
- Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic Tom Beecher (Nov 08)
- Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic Daniel Corbe (Nov 08)
- Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic John Weekes (Nov 08)
- Message not available