nanog mailing list archives

Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22


From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:32:04 +0000

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 at 19:26, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> wrote:

A reason to de-aggregate down to /24s, to make hijacks more difficult/less
effective?


Or perhaps something less costly for everyone: a reason for HE to implement
prefix-based EBGP filters?

At any given moment there appear to be roughly 5500 prefixes in HE’s
customer cone for which no attestation can be found in any of IRR, RPKI or
WHOIS. I find this deeply concerning.

Kind regards,

Job




Current thread: