nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 10:57:11 -0500 (CDT)

Arguing against less than /24s in the public routing table. That's not the point being made. 

The point being made is the relaxation of requirements to obtain /24s for ISPs. 

To that I point to a statement John Curran made in a keynote I attended several conferences ago. If you wish to change 
ARIN policy, a small room of people can change it to say whatever they want because no one participates in the process. 


https://www.arin.net/participate/how_to_participate.html 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Martin List-Petersen" <martin () airwire ie> 
To: "Justin Wilson" <lists () mtin net>, nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 1:24:22 PM 
Subject: Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? 

Hi, 

needing a /24 to participate in BGP has always been sort of a world-wide 
standard. 

Even before the explosion of the IPv4 BGP full table (which has more 
than doubled in the last decade), that was the standard. 

Because ..... if carriers (and ISPs) accepted upstream < /24, then you'd 
have an entirely different animal at large. 

The issue here is not ARIN, or RIPE, or APNIC, or AfriNIC etc. 

The issue is, that the industry standard is to filter the upstream table 
and not to accept smaller than /24 ... so even if the policies were 
changed your </24 would still not be routable .... end off discussion. 

It would take decades before you'd see it routable everywhere .. if at 
all .. as ISPs and Carriers relax their filters. 

And before that happens, IPv6 will be the norm .... so it won't happen. 

Kind regards, 
Martin List-Petersen 
Airwire Ltd. 


On 13/03/18 18:14, Justin Wilson wrote: 
Even to buy it on the secondary market you have to have justification and show usage. So if someone buys a /24 and 
really only needs a /25 then what? It ARIN, or others for that matter, going to relax those requirements? If I am an 
ISP and need to do BGP, maybe because I have a big downstream customer, I have to have a /24 to participate in BGP. I 
see these scenarios more and more. 

Justin Wilson 
j2sw () mtin net 

www.mtin.net 
www.midwest-ix.com 

On Mar 13, 2018, at 2:08 PM, Bob Evans <bob () FiberInternetCenter com> wrote: 

Marketplaces - supply and demand and costs to operate as Bill noted (never 
thought of that) will settle out the need. 

Thank You 
Bob Evans 
CTO 




I am looking at it from an ARIN justification point. If you are a small 
operator and need a /24 you have justification if you give customer’s 
publics, but is it a great line if you are only giving out publics for 
people who need cameras or need to connect in from the outside world. If I 
need a /24 and I don’t really use it all am I being shady? It becomes a 
“how much of a grey area is there” kind of thing. 


Justin Wilson 
j2sw () mtin net 

www.mtin.net 
www.midwest-ix.com 

On Mar 13, 2018, at 1:37 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: 

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net> wrote: 
I agree that the global routing table is pretty bloated as is. But 
what kind of a solution for providers who need to participate in BGP 
but only need a /25? 

Hi Justin, 

If you need a /25 and BGP for multihoming or anycasting, get a /24. 
The cost you impose on the system by using BGP *at all* is much higher 
than the cost you impose on the system by consuming less than 250 
"unneeded" Ip addresses. 

I did a cost analysis on a BGP announcement a decade or so ago. The 
exact numbers have changed but the bottom line hasn't: it's 
ridiculously consumptive. 

Regards, 
Bill Herrin 



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> 








-- 
Airwire Ltd. - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair 
http://www.airwire.ie 
Phone: 091-395 000 
Registered Office: Moy, Kinvara, Co. Galway, 091-395 000 - Registered in 
Ireland No. 508961 


Current thread: