nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS
From: Tim Jackson <jackson.tim () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:48:43 +0000
You can either attach the end of the l2circuit to an LT interface, or a PS interface. https://www.google.com/amp/s/tgregory.org/2016/07/10/pseudowire-headend-termination-pwht-for-juniper-mx/amp/ https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/pseudowire-subscriber-interfaces-overview.html https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/usage-guidelines/services-configuring-logical-tunnel-interfaces.html On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, 9:27 AM Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy () gmail com> wrote:
When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2 pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI. I'm trying to do the same thing on a Juniper MX 480/960 and it does not appear to be supported (for LDP at least - MP-BGP might be supported). We could do either VPWS or VPLS on the PE device handoff to the CE (layer 2 only). JTAC has somewhat confirmed this is not supported for LDP, but they only do break/fix, not new config. We do not have professional services (we are broke). Any Juniper routerheads out there that have seen this done using LDP without having to hairpin on the MX? Thanks, y'all. -ben
Current thread:
- Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Ben Bartsch (Mar 17)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Tim Jackson (Mar 17)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Ben Bartsch (Mar 19)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Chuck Anderson (Mar 19)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Ben Bartsch (Mar 19)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Ben Bartsch (Mar 19)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Ben Bartsch (Mar 22)
- Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS Chuck Anderson (Mar 19)