nanog mailing list archives
Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing
From: Jim Shankland <nanog () shankland org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:21:56 -0800
On 3/7/18 9:00 AM, Ian Mock wrote:
Actually, as a reflection of the provider's cost, NRC for a cross-connect makes more sense than a recurring cost. After all, there's labor involved in setting up the cross-connect, but once it's in, it pretty much just sits there.Everything is negotiable. NRC on a cross-connect is ridiculous. The cost to run should be made up with the amount they're charging monthly. I wouldn't pay more than $200/mo for copper.
The fallacy here, though, is assuming that rational pricing bears some relation to the vendor's cost to provide the good or service. Actual price is based on what the market will bear. Sharing pricing information on NANOG likely helps consumers by increasing market transparency (which is why vendors love to block such sharing via NDA). Much as I sympathize with the sentiment, though, "ridiculous" is meaningless in this context. It may even be construed as positive, as in: "Awesome, we're making ridiculous profits on all these copper cross-connects." :-)
Jim
Current thread:
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing, (continued)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Keith Stokes (Mar 07)
- RE: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Romeo Czumbil (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Seth Mattinen (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Mike Hammett (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Ethan (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Matt Erculiani (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Stephen Satchell (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Seth Mattinen (Mar 07)
- RE: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Romeo Czumbil (Mar 07)
- Re: Zayo zColo Xcon Pricing Jim Shankland (Mar 09)