nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 12:04:55 +0100
On 2018-05-29 13:48, Ryugo Kikuchi wrote:
Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" forCisco ASR and Nexus?Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try touse 3rd party 100g SFP. But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good performance.
FlexOptix (.net) are an excellent third-party provider for your first foray into non-vendor optics.
Tom
Current thread:
- 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Phil Lavin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Tom Hill (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Shawn Ritchie (Jun 06)
- RE: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Michel Py (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Eric Litvin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 11)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Alex S. (Jun 07)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)