nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:51:07 +0200
man. 4. jun. 2018 20.56 skrev Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>:
It occurs to me that operators might want to opt-in to have their data published through PeeringDB. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, I won’t peer with anyone I can’t reach out to and if you don’t have a 24/7 NOC chances are good that you’re going to get depeered the first time there’s a technical issue and I can’t reach you for help. An academic exercise, for sure. But one that would render this line of thinking rather moot.
If it is a true 24/7 NOC you can not possibly expect a specific person to answer the call. It will be whoever is on duty or on call at that time. You do not need a name. Just the number and the email address. And that is exactly what many operators put into peeringdb as is. No changes needed. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit, (continued)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rodney Joffe (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Daniel Corbe (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rubens Kuhl (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Stephen Satchell (Jun 01)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 04)