Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?)

[Lee Howard <lee.howard () retevia net>]

On 06/17/2018 02:53 PM, Brad wrote:
> While I agree there are unintended consequences every time advancements are made in relation to the security and 
> stability of the Internet- I disagree we should be rejecting their implementations. Instead, we should innovate further.

I look forward to your innovations.
> Just because end to end encryption causes bandwidth issues for a very small number users - then perhaps they could 
> benefit the most by these changes with additional capacity.

I encourage you to invest billions of dollars in rural broadband 
capacity worldwide. The rest of us will thank you for your sacrifice.

Lee

> -Brad
>
> -------- Original message --------From: Michael Hallgren <mh () xalto net> Date: 6/17/18  11:14  (GMT-07:00) To: nanog () 
> jack fr eu org Cc: Matthew Petach <matt () petach org>, nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any 
> solution?)
> Le 2018-06-17 12:40, nanog () jack fr eu org a écrit :
> > Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption
> Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with
> that).
>
> Cheers,
> mh
>
> > On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> > > Except that if websites are set to HTTPS only, there's no option for
> > > disabling encryption on the client side.
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 14:47 <nanog () jack fr eu org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 06/16/2018 10:13 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > > > > Sadly, it's just falling on deaf ears. Silicon Valley will continue
> > > > > to
> > > > think they know better than everyone else and people outside of that
> > > > bubble
> > > > will continue to be disadvantaged.
> > > >
> > > > What, again ?
> > > > Encryption is what is best for the most people.
> > > > The few that will not use it can disable it.
> > > >
> > > > No issue then.