nanog mailing list archives
Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
From: Job Snijders <job () ntt net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 23:08:05 +0200
Dear all, TL;DR: Perhaps it is time to add 2002::/16 to our EBGP bogon filters? It is kind of strange that in the default-free zone (where we don’t announce defaults to each other) - we will propagate what is effectively an IPv4 default-route, in the IPv6 DFZ. IETF has politely abandoned the prefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7526 Wes George highlighted operational problems from accepting 2002::/16 on the data-plane slide 6: http://iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/wes.pdf Is there still really any legit reason left to accept, or propagate, 2002::/16 on EBGP sessions in the DFZ? Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Job Snijders (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Jared Mauch (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? joel jaeggli (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Nick Hilliard (Jun 19)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Job Snijders (Jun 28)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? John Kristoff (Jun 18)
- RE: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? McBride, Mack (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Ca By (Jun 18)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- RE: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? McBride, Mack (Jun 18)