Re: FWIW... Re: TEST Help? TEST

["Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>]

On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Apologies for the noise.  Please hit delete...
----------------------------------------

Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6 
faster/better proof?"  thread I can't reply to.  
I still can't.  All I wanted to say was:




--- cb.list6 () gmail com wrote:
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>

I hear transit is dead

https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/
--------------------------------------------

Funny that he also seems to take indirect aim at IPv6:

"In this case, then in such a collection of service 
cones, is there any residual value in a globally 
consistent address space? If all the traffic flows are 
constrained to sit within each service cone, then the 
residual addressing requirement is at best a requirement 
to uniquely distinguish end points just within the scope 
of the cone without any particular requirement for 
network-wide uniqueness "


That seems to point to John Day's architecture; RINA:
https://www.slideshare.net/ictpristine/rina-introduction-part-i


scott