nanog mailing list archives
RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?
From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride () charter com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:41:42 +0000
Better than excel at "Two People Editing Lane" Mack -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:20 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Google Docs =D (Just to be annoying). ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 06/12/18 13:17, McBride, Mack wrote:
Excel does not go down 'Will It Scale Road'. It ignores the stop light and crashes at 'Two People Editing Lane'. Mack -----Original Message----- From: Stacy Hughes [mailto:ipgoddess () gmail com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:43 AM To: McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride () charter com> Cc: surfer () mauigateway com; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry, so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6. StacyOn Jun 12, 2018, at 8:13 AM, McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride () charter com> wrote: Allocations, not IPs. And yes if they are reasonably static an excel spreadsheet can go higher. Mack -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:40 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? --- C-Mack.McBride () charter com wrote: From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride () charter com> If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4. ----------------------------------------- I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well over a quarter million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years. So, that's an 'it depends' answer. scott E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?, (continued)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Eric Kuhnke (Jun 13)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Luca Salvatore via NANOG (Jun 14)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Jay Christopher (Jun 14)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Eric Kuhnke (Jun 13)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Brian Jeggesen (Jun 14)
- RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? Scott Weeks (Jun 11)
- RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? McBride, Mack (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Stacy Hughes (Jun 12)
- RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? McBride, Mack (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Alain Hebert (Jun 12)
- RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? McBride, Mack (Jun 12)
- RE: What are people using for IPAM these days? McBride, Mack (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Chris Adams (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Bryan Holloway (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Brian Kantor (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? valdis . kletnieks (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Stephen Satchell (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Rodney Joffe (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? mike . lyon (Jun 12)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Randy Bush (Jun 13)
- Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? Eric Kuhnke (Jun 13)