nanog mailing list archives

Re: Proving Gig Speed


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:11:03 -0500 (CDT)

https://www.ignitenet.com/wireless-backhaul/ 
https://www.siklu.com/product/multihaul-series/ 

https://mikrotik.com/product/wireless_wire_dish 
https://mikrotik.com/product/wap_60g_ap 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka () seacom mu> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 6:57:28 AM 
Subject: Re: Proving Gig Speed 




On 17/Jul/18 18:07, Mike Hammett wrote: 



The problem cited is the last 100', not the last mile. 

For ISPs using 60 GHz for the last mile, a wire is ran from the outdoor antenna to the indoor router. 


Yeah, the question was rhetorical. 

I personally don't see ISP's using 60GHz to deliver to the home at scale. But I'll side with Saku and bet against 
myself for reliably predicting the future. 

Mark. 


Current thread: