nanog mailing list archives
Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:40:10 -0800
Huh? I’m saying they are network identifiers and not something else (like POP names, or geographical indexes, or inventory control numbers, or crypto currency or whatever else). So I’m not sure I understand your point here. Owen
On Jan 2, 2018, at 15:58 , William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com <mailto:owen () delong com>> wrote: I agree we all have a responsibility to hold the line on addresses being network identifiers Hi Owen, The delicious irony here is that EUI-64 supporting SLAAC is exactly that: an identifier. If we hold the line there, there is no line. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com <mailto:herrin () dirtside com> bill () herrin us <mailto:bill () herrin us> Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/ <http://www.dirtside.com/>>
Current thread:
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) valdis . kletnieks (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Andrew Kirch (Jan 01)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) bzs (Jan 02)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Owen DeLong (Jan 02)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) William Herrin (Jan 02)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Owen DeLong (Jan 03)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) bzs (Jan 02)