nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU to CDN's
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:18:47 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Mike Hammett wrote:
Wouldn't those situations be causing issues now, given the likelihood that someone with a less than 1,500 byte MTU is communicating with you now?
If the issue is that you're letting 8996 byte packets through but not 9000 byte packets, then no.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: MTU to CDN's, (continued)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mark Andrews (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Vincent Bernat (Jan 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: MTU to CDN's Michael Crapse (Jan 18)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 18)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mike Hammett (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mike Hammett (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Jared Mauch (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mike Hammett (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Vincent Bernat (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's William Herrin (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Olivier Benghozi (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Ruairi Carroll (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's William Herrin (Jan 19)
- Re: MTU to CDN's Mark Andrews (Jan 08)