nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:03:13 -0500
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:28:13AM -0600, Colton Conor wrote:
The goal would be to have a universal network operating system that runs across a variety of devices.
And for certain uses, that would be handy. Of course it would also be handy to an attacker who found or purchased or was given an exploitable hole in that OS, because then they could pwn the entire intrastructure simultaneously. One-stop shopping, as it were. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Open Souce Network Operating Systems Colton Conor (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Ruairi Carroll (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Hugo Slabbert (Jan 17)
- RE: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Edwin Pers (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Rich Kulawiec (Jan 17)
- RE: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Matthew Smee (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Hugo Slabbert (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Raymond Burkholder (Jan 17)
- RE: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Matthew Smee (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Ruairi Carroll (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 17)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Eron Lloyd (Jan 18)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Colton Conor (Jan 20)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Peter Phaal (Jan 20)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Colton Conor (Jan 20)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems i mawsog via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Peter Phaal (Jan 20)
- Re: Open Souce Network Operating Systems Colton Conor (Jan 20)