nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:35:37 +0100
Joining an IX is in most cases much more expensive than buying a /24. You can get a /26 from your upstream. Having multiple upstreams is in most cases much more expensive than buying a /24. I do not see a real problem here. Aside from the irritation of having to pay for resources others got for free and then horded. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Michael Hallgren (Jan 05)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Mike Hammett (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? William Herrin (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Dovid Bender (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Justin Wilson (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? valdis . kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Ken Chase (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Mike Hammett (Jan 05)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Mike Hammett (Jan 05)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? William Herrin (Jan 05)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Baldur Norddahl (Jan 05)
- RE: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Naslund, Steve (Jan 05)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? valdis . kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Mike Hammett (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Justin Wilson (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Michael Hallgren (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing? Filip Hruska (Jan 04)