nanog mailing list archives

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 18:26:21 -0800

Which is it…

It’s being reported on NPR as “Australia required Apple and others to remove encryption protections from their devices.”

That’s a massively different (and arguably even worse) outcome than “Australia is requiring Apple and others to provide
decryption technology to law enforcement.”

Owen


On Dec 8, 2018, at 14:41 , bzs () theworld com wrote:


On December 8, 2018 at 19:41 hank () efes iucc ac il (Hank Nussbacher) wrote:
Governments that require ISPs to block "certain" sites have no clue what is
required technologically to adhere to their demands.

Well that's certainly true.

Australia just passed a law mandating decryption be made available to
law enforcement simply ignoring the many technical explanations about
why we don't know how to do this without compromising security
entirely.

I've often said if a judge in their court orders you to raise your
left foot in the air you would be well-advised to lift that foot.

If the judge orders you to also raise your right foot the judge
doesn't have a problem, YOU have a problem.

-- 
       -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*


Current thread: