nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stupid Question maybe?
From: "tim () pelican org" <tim () pelican org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:54:02 -0000 (GMT)
On Tuesday, 18 December, 2018 22:43, "Brandon Martin" <lists.nanog () monmotha net> said:
This is a favorite interview type question of mine, but I won't disqualify a candidate if they can't come up with the reason. It's more of a probe for historical domain knowledge (one of many I'll slip in).
It's an interesting flag at interview for me, if it comes up, but I wouldn't normally talk about it unless the candidate does first. -If they don't know or mention classful networking at all, they're new (relatively, I'm old), and that's fine. -If they can get it right, they're either a long-timer or have done some network history. -If they try to use it, and get it wrong, or can't properly explain it, there's a warning that they've been cramming network skills from some old and/or low-quality sources. I'd start probing for other warning signs like /24s on point-to-point serial links, RIPv1, and the like. Regards, Tim.
Current thread:
- RE: Stupid Question maybe?, (continued)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? Naslund, Steve (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Florian Weimer (Dec 21)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? William Allen Simpson (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Scott Weeks (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Scott Weeks (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Brandon Martin (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? James R Cutler (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Brandon Martin (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? tim () pelican org (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Brandon Martin (Dec 18)